<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventures in Silverlight 3 Multi-touch, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designwithsilverlight.com/2009/08/17/adventures-in-silverlight-3-multi-touch-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designwithsilverlight.com/2009/08/17/adventures-in-silverlight-3-multi-touch-part-i/</link>
	<description>Silverlight... you're soaking in it.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Barraza</title>
		<link>http://designwithsilverlight.com/2009/08/17/adventures-in-silverlight-3-multi-touch-part-i/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Barraza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designwithsilverlight.com/?p=177#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>FYI I'm running an HP Touchsmart 22" and it does run under Windows 7 build 7100 in IE. Coding for touch points in Silverlight is similar but still different enough than coding touch points in Surface to prove a bit "Lost in Translation". I hope SL, WPF and Surface start consolidating paradigms instead of each group reinventing its own implementation for no significantly better reason than "not built here". But having a lot of fun with it either way. Looking forward to your other posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI I&#8217;m running an HP Touchsmart 22&#8243; and it does run under Windows 7 build 7100 in IE. Coding for touch points in Silverlight is similar but still different enough than coding touch points in Surface to prove a bit &#8220;Lost in Translation&#8221;. I hope SL, WPF and Surface start consolidating paradigms instead of each group reinventing its own implementation for no significantly better reason than &#8220;not built here&#8221;. But having a lot of fun with it either way. Looking forward to your other posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Y</title>
		<link>http://designwithsilverlight.com/2009/08/17/adventures-in-silverlight-3-multi-touch-part-i/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designwithsilverlight.com/?p=177#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing your experience.
It is very exciting technology and I am looking forward to hear more from you.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing your experience.<br />
It is very exciting technology and I am looking forward to hear more from you.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop &#8211; August 18, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://designwithsilverlight.com/2009/08/17/adventures-in-silverlight-3-multi-touch-part-i/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop &#8211; August 18, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designwithsilverlight.com/?p=177#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>[...] Adventures in Silverlight 3 Multi-touch, Part I (Jeff Paries) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adventures in Silverlight 3 Multi-touch, Part I (Jeff Paries) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
